That’s not a wife
OK, we know the actors get together in real life (and are still together today, 25 years later), and that, as there appears to be little difference between the actors and their onscreen characters, that probably tends to skew everyone’s opinion of Mick and Sue’s potential as a couple. But do we really think they could be The Reel Thing?
Sorry mates, but we don’t. She is a sophisticated New Yorker from a wealthy family; he is a backwoods crocodile poacher from Down Under. Honestly, other than physical chemistry and perhaps the added danger for her of dating someone so completely alien and inappropriate, what could they possibly have in common?
We could definitely see her wanting to have a fling with him while they’re both in Australia. He’s charming, he’s sexy, he’s a little rough around the edges. And he definitely ranks higher on the testosterone meter than Richard, the self-centered milksop she’s been dating. But we think once she gets back to New York and sees Mick on her home turf through her city goggles she’s going to wish she hadn’t lured him halfway around the globe. (Trust us – we’ve traveled and we know of what we speak. They never look as good once you’re back home.)
Linda and Paul may have survived the test of time, but we don’t foresee the same for Sue and Mick.
Side note: Can we just say…WORST fake rich woman wardrobe in a movie ever. The clothes look like something you’d see in a high school production. In the final scene Sue leaves her apartment dressed in a cheap looking red dress, heels, huge red sunglasses, black gloves, and – our favorite touch – a long black and white head scarf. Please! It’s 10 o’clock in the morning! This movie was made in the 80′s and they have Sue dressed like Bette Davis in the 40′s. Where is Patricia Fields when you need her?








(1 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)








